Canon and Sony News for Jul 2024

From Tamron Americas:

TAMRON Announces the Launch of the 10.7x All-in-One Zoom Lens
28-300mm F/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD (Model A074)

Commack, NY – Tamron announces the launch of the 28-300mm F/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD (Model A074), a 10.7x all-in-one zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras on August 29, 2024, at $899 USD / $1199 CAD.

The TAMRON 28-300mm F4-7.1 VC is an all-in-one zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. This lens covers a broad focal length range from 28mm wide-angle to 300mm telephoto with superior imaging performance. It achieves a zoom ratio of 10.7x with a length of just 5” (126mm) and weighs only 21.5 oz. (610g). The lens is equipped with the VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) linear motor focus mechanism, enabling it to focus quickly and accurately throughout the entire zoom range. The lens also features TAMRON’s VC (Vibration Compensation) mechanism to ensure sharp hand-held images when shooting at the 300mm telephoto end and in low-light conditions. With an MOD (Minimum Object Distance) of 7.5” (0.19m) and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.8 at the wide end, the lens allows users to enjoy the world of wide macro photography. It includes a Focus Set Button and a connector port for the dedicated TAMRON Lens Utility™ software independently developed by TAMRON to expand the scope of expression for still images and video. The lens features Moisture-Resistant Construction, and the front element has a protective Fluorine Coating. The new 28-300mm F/4-7.1 VC lets users take photos in an extremely wide range of situations with just one lens.

PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

1. 10.7x zoom lens for full-frame mirrorless cameras that covers the focal length range from 28mm wide-angle to 300mm telephoto

The greatest feature of the 28-300mm F/4-7.1 VC is its 10.7x zoom focal length range. In response to users stating that 200mm is not quite long enough at the telephoto end for an all-in-one zoom lens, TAMRON has extended the focal length to 300mm. Exceptionally portable, the lens features a highly compact design. This single lens allows shooting in everyday life and during travel, including landscapes, snapshots, portraits and sports photography. It's an extremely versatile lens that lets users take photos in any situation of any subject without changing lenses.

2. Outstanding imaging performance

This new TAMRON zoom has an optical construction of 20 elements in 13 groups. It includes one XLD (eXtra Low Dispersion) lens element and an LD (Low Dispersion) lens element to efficiently control aberrations such as chromatic aberration. The BBAR-G2 (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection Generation 2) Coating suppresses ghosting and flare, producing clear images even in backlit conditions. It boasts best-in-class image quality as an all-in-one zoom lens for full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras.

3. Lightweight and compact lens body

Despite covering a 10.7x focal length range from 28mm wide-angle to 300mm telephoto, the lens is very compact, with a length of only 5” (126mm) and a weight of 21.5 oz. (610g). Small and versatile, it can be casually carried anywhere, and users are unlikely to tire even after long hours of shooting. It's ideal for people who want to carry a smaller camera bag. Additionally, the lens makes it easy to frame accurately when shooting still and moving images while zooming in and out, such as sports and wildlife, and is designed to be comfortable to use.

4. Equipped with VXD, TAMRON’s top-class linear motor focus mechanism

The 28-300mm F/4-7.1 VC is equipped with the VXD autofocus drive that includes TAMRON’s premium linear motor focus mechanism to ensure that the focus is attained quickly and accurately throughout the 10.7x zoom range. Upending the stereotype of all-in-one zoom lenses having slow autofocus, its nimble operation allows users to capture more fleeting photo opportunities. The quietness supports photography and videography in conditions that require silence.

5. TAMRON’s proprietary VC mechanism

Although it's compact, the 28-300mm F/4-7.1 is equipped with TAMRON’s proprietary VC mechanism that lets users take steady photos, especially at the 300mm telephoto end of its broad 10.7x range. VC effectively suppresses camera shake that often occurs when shooting in the telephoto range or under low-light conditions, thereby helping users take sharp photos without a tripod.

6. Proprietary software tool TAMRON Lens Utility for lens function customization and firmware updates

7. High convenience and operability

- 67mm filter size, same as most other TAMRON lenses for mirrorless cameras
- Focus Set Button for assigning camera function and TAMRON Lens Utility function
- Enhanced overall lens design for user-friendly operation
- Zoom Lock mechanism

8. Protective features (Moisture-Resistant Construction and Fluorine Coating)

9. Compatible with many camera-onboard features and functions, including Fast Hybrid AF and Eye AF

SPECIFICATIONS

Model: A074
Focal Length: 28-300mm
Maximum Aperture: F4-7.1
Angle of View (diagonal): 75°23'-8°15' (for full-frame mirrorless format)
Optical Construction: 20 elements in 13 groups
Minimum Object Distance: 7.5” / 0.19m (WIDE), 39” / 0.99m (TELE)
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:2.8 (WIDE) / 1:3.8 (TELE)
VC (Vibration Compensation): Yes
Filter Size: Ø67mm
Maximum Diameter: Ø77mm
Length*: 5” (126mm)
Weight: 21.5 oz. (610g)
Aperture Blades**: 9 (circular diaphragm)
Minimum Aperture: F22-40
Standard Accessories: Flower-shaped hood, Front cap, Rear cap
Mount: Sony E-mount

* Length is the distance from the front end of the lens to the lens mount face.

** The circular diaphragm stays almost perfectly circular up to two stops down from maximum aperture.

Specifications, appearance, functionality, etc. are subject to change without prior notice.

This product is developed, manufactured, and sold based on the specifications of E-mount which was disclosed by Sony Corporation under the license agreement with Sony Corporation.

Orders

Support this site by ordering the Tamron 28-300mm F4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Lens (or anything else) from B&H.

Just posted: Canon AD-E1 Multi-Function Shoe Adapter Review.

What is the Canon AD-E1 Multi-Function Shoe Adapter? Do you need one? Find out now.

Support this site by ordering the Canon AD-E1 Multi-Function Shoe Adapter (or anything else) from B&H | Adorama | Canon USA | WEX | Camera Canada

Rent the Canon AD-E1 Multi-Function Shoe Adapter from Lensrentals.

Please share!

Sony Alpha 7 IV firmware update version 3.02 is available for download.

Firmware Version 3.02 incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:

1. Improved an issue where recording may stop during video recording.

Always read the precautions.

Get the Sony Alpha 7 IV at B&H.

I've been using a pair of Alpha 1 cameras for Sony lens testing and for field use when a Sony lens better fit the need. The flagship a1 is an outstanding camera. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the Sony Alpha 1?

Check out the R5 II vs. a1 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras.

Here is a summary of the R5 II's advantages:

• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• AF working range of EV -7.5 to 21 vs. EV -4 – 20 (the Canon camera focuses in considerably darker environments)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 1200-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• More framerate options – 30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 compared to 30, 20, 15, and 5 (with electronic shutter, but the mechanical shutter adds 10, 8, 6, and 3)
• Up to 8k DCI 60p RAW vs. 8K 30p
• 2.1 million dot vari-angle LCD vs. 1.44 million tilt
• CFexpress Type B and UHS-II SD slots vs. dual multi slot for UHS-II SD and CFexpress Type A (Type B cards are faster and less expensive than A cards, but A cards are smaller and faster than SD cards)
• 8.5-stop IBIS vs. 5.5
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (both with JPG output only)
• High-Frequency Anti-Flicker shooting (evaluates the scene and precisely adjusts the shutter speed to avoid banding and flicker, including from LED signage)
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• 4-Channel 24-Bit LPCM Audio vs. 2-Channel 16-Bit
• Modestly lighter
• Far lower price

That is a solid list.

Here are the a1's advantages:

• 50 megapixels vs. 45 megapixels (50 is my favorite, but 45 is close)
• 3.8 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 6.3 (faster readout reduces electronic shutter issues)
• +/- 5 stops exposure compensation vs. 3
• 240 fps EVF vs. 120
• Pixel Shift Multi Shooting (provides dramatically higher resolution after post processing, but everything in the frame must be still)
• 0.64" (16mm) 9.44 million dot EVF vs. 0.50" (12.7mm) 5.76 million dots
• 1/400 max flash sync vs. 1/250
• Ethernet port vs. available with accessory grip
• Modestly smaller

Comparing across brands is significantly challenged by the differing interface and ergonomics, and these two cameras have significant differences in those regards. Advantages will often be determined by personal preference.

The bottom line is that both cameras are incredible and my two favorites. However, the R5 II's $2,199.00 lower price makes it a considerably better deal.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Sony Alpha 1

The a9 series targets sports and action, and the a9 III is Sony's latest model in that series. This camera was introduced earlier in the same year as the R1, and includes some outstanding features.

Check out the R1 vs. a9 III specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras.

What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the a9 III? Here are the R1 advantages:

• ISO 100-102400 expandable to 50 and 409600 vs. 250–25600 and 125 to 51200 (notably, the a9 III omits the lowest noise settings)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• AF working range of EV -7.5 to 21 vs. EV -5 – 20 (the Canon camera focuses in darker environments)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 1200-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• 230 image RAW buffer vs. 106
• Has 6K RAW
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Has a top LCD panel
• Dual CFexpress Type B slots vs. dual multi slot for SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-I/II)/CFexpress Type A (Type B cards are faster and less expensive than A cards, but A cards are smaller and SD cards are less expensive)
• Higher capacity battery rated for 1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 530 and 400 (the a9 III's battery grip doubles these numbers, closing much of the gap)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (both with JPG output only)
• 8.5-stop IBIS vs. 8

The a9 III's advantages are:

• Global shutter, 0 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 2.7 ms (While this difference seems small, the global shutter can eliminate some issues, such as LED signage flicker)
• 120 fps continuous shooting vs. 40 (while 40 fps is sufficient for most needs, the 120 fps difference is noticeable)
• Metering range of EV -5 – 17 compared to EV -3 – 20
• +/- 5.0 EV exposure compensation vs. +/- 3
• 1/80000 shutter vs. 1/64000 (likely few us us will care about this difference)
• Flash sync to 1/80000 vs. 1/400
• 0.64" (16mm) EVF vs. 0.50" (12.7mm)
• 240 fps EVF refresh rate vs. 120 fps
• 4-axis multi-angle touchscreen LCD vs. vari-angle
• Considerably smaller and lighter: 26.0 vs. 39.3 oz (737 vs. 1115 g) (but the a9 III's grip adds 10.23 oz (290 g) and considerable size, closing the gap)
• Slightly less expensive

Again, comparing across brands is significantly challenged by the differing interface and ergonomics, and these two cameras are vastly different. Those advantages are a personal preference.

If you have not already done so, order the R1 immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R1

Sony Alpha 9 III

Three Sigma DG DN Art lenses have firmware new updates available:

• Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens version 04
• Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art Lens version 02
• Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art Lens version 04

Download these updates from Sigma Global.

These firmware updates incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:

1. Compatibility with continuous shooting of up to approximately 120 frames per second has been added for the autofocus modes (AF-S/DMF/MF) on Sony a9 III cameras.
2. The operational stability has been improved. (only Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens)

Let's compare a pair of outstanding Sony cameras, starting with the flagship Sony Alpha 1. Check out the R1 vs. Alpha 1 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras.

What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the a1? Here are the R1 advantages:

• 40 fps for 230 RAW images vs. 30 fps for 238 (96 frame using the comparable lossless compression) (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast)
• 12 fps with mechanical shutter vs. 10 (only matters if you use it)
• More framerate options – 40, 30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 compared to 30, 20, 15, and 5 (with electronic shutter, but the mechanical shutter adds 10, 8, 6, and 3)
• 2.7 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 3.8 (while technically a win for the R1, you won't likely notice the difference, and the Sony is reading 50 megapixels at that speed)
• AF working range of EV -7.5 to 21 vs. EV -4 – 20 (the Canon camera focuses in considerably darker environments)
• ISO 100-102400 expandable to 50 and 409600 vs. 100–32000 and 50 to 102400 (the R1 will show less noise at the pixel level, but the two should nearly equalize if the a1 image is down sampled to 24 megapixels — and you won't want to use the highest ISO settings)
• 1/64000 vs. 1/32000 (crazy fast holds a small niche advantage over extremely fast)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 1200-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Electronic shutter flash sync up to 1/400 sec. (some sources say 1/320) vs. 1/200
• 2.1 million dot vari-angle LCD vs. 1.44 million tilt
• Has a top LCD panel
• Dual CFexpress Type B slots vs. dual multi slot for SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-I/II)/CFexpress Type A (Type B cards are faster and less expensive than A cards, but A cards are smaller and SD cards are less expensive)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (both with JPG output only)
• 8.5-stop IBIS vs. 5.5
• High-Frequency Anti-Flicker shooting (evaluates the scene and precisely adjusts the shutter speed to avoid banding and flicker, including from LED signage)
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• 4-Channel 24-Bit LPCM Audio vs. 2-Channel 16-Bit
• Higher capacity battery rated for 1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 530 and 430 (the a1's battery grip doubles these numbers, closing much of the gap)
• Slightly less expensive

Despite being introduced 3 years earlier, the a1 still holds advantages:

• 50 megapixel vs. 24 (a big difference, but not everyone finds the higher resolution worth the increased storage size and processing time)
• Touch and drag AF area slection vs. not available
• +/- 5 stops exposure compensation vs. 3
• 240 fps EVF vs. 120
• 8K 30p vs. 6K 60p movies
• Pixel Shift Multi Shooting (provides dramatically higher resolution after post processing, but everything in the frame must be still)
• 0.64" (16mm) EVF vs. 0.50" (12.7mm)
• Considerably smaller and lighter: 26.0 vs. 39.3 oz (737 vs. 1115 g) (but the a1's grip adds 10.23 oz (290 g) and considerable size, closing the gap)

Comparing across brands is significantly challenged by the differing interface and ergonomics, and these two cameras are vastly different in those regards. Advantages will often be determined by personal preference.

If you have not already done so, order the R1 immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R1

Sony Alpha 1

The Canon EOS R3 seemed like the mirrorless entrant to the 1 series, but Canon assured us that it was not. However, it was the former performance leader of Canon's MILC lineup.

The R1 now shadows the R3's performance.

Check out the R1 vs. R3 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the R3? Here are the R1's advantages:

• 40 fps for 230 RAW frames vs. 30 fps for 150 (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast, and 150 is a lot)
• Custom high-speed continuous shooting supports higher frame rates
• 2.7 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 4.8 (faster is better, but this difference will seldom be noticeable)
• ISO expansion up to 409600 vs. 102400 (you will not want to use these settings)
• Cross-type AF points (holds the potential for higher AF precision)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Smart Controllers with half-press sensitivity for additional control
• 9.44 million dots, 0.90x EVF vs. 5.76 and 0.76x (bigger and better)
• Dual CFexpress type B memory card slots vs. CFexpress type B and SD (though some may prefer having an SD slot available)
• M.Fn3, WB, and second Info buttons
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator processors for exceptionally fast and intelligent AF and AE calculations
• IBIS provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Improved Eye Control AF (potentially a big deal if the R3's Eye Control was not compatible with your eye)
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• Full HD at 240p vs. 120p
• Pre-recording (3 or 5 seconds) (hindsight is far clearer than foresight)
• HDMI Type-A vs. Type-D
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Longer battery life rating (1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 860 and 620)

Here are the R3's advantages:

• 4.15 million dot LCD vs. 2.1 million
• modestly smaller and lighter
• Lower price

If that last bullet did not exist, the easy choice would be the R1. The last bullet is supported, and the R3 provides significant performance for its cost. Still, the most demanding professionals will want the R1.

The R5 II and R1 now shadow the EOS R3, the former performance leader of the MILC lineup.

Check out the R5 II vs. R3 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R3? Here are the R5 II's advantages:

• 45-megapixel imaging sensor vs. 24 (the difference is big, but not everyone wants the higher resolution)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator processors for exceptionally fast and intelligent AF and AE calculations
• IBIS provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Improved Eye Control AF (potentially a big deal if the R3's Eye Control was not compatible with your eye)
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• 8k vs. 6K (higher resolution is better if you use 8k)
• Pre-recording (3 or 5 seconds) (hindsight is far clearer than foresight)
• HDMI Type-A vs. Type-D
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Holds 4260 mAh of power in the vertical grip vs. 2750 mAh
• Considerably smaller and lighter (without vertical grip)
• Lower price (though R3 promotions are equalizing this advantage)

Here are the R3's advantages:

• Supports high-speed continuous shooting for 150 RAW images vs. 93
• Custom high-speed continuous shooting supports higher frame rates
• Up to 1/64000 shutter speed vs. 1/32000 (crazy fast vs. extremely fast)
• Smart Controllers (powerful controls after some acclimation)
• 4.15 million dot LCD vs. 2.1 million
• Integrated vertical grip, LAN port, and GPS (outstanding grip ergonomics, the grip, port, and GPS are available accessories for the R5 II)
• Superior dust and weather resistance (with both bodies significantly sealed, will we notice the difference?)
• More controls and buttons (these make the camera faster and easier to use. And, more complicated?)
• More powerful 2750 mAh LP-E19 battery pack vs. 2130 mAh (but the R5 II holds 4260 mAh in the vertical grip)

While most photographers will find the R5 II better suited for their needs, a niche group of photographers will find the R3's advantages important.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R3

Canon has added second quarter financial results to the Investor Relations page.

Presentation Material
Results
Supplementary Data
Presentation Material and Speech Summary

Quotes From the Presentation Material (in addition to the included chart).

In markets in which we compete, demand remained weak in certain regions due to slowdown in global economic growth

Recovery in camera, network camera, and laser printer sales as inventory adjustments were completed as planned

Steady growth in semiconductor lithography equipment, commercial printing equipment, and medical business sales where medium- to long-term market growth is expected

Achieved 14% increase in sales compared to the same period last year and record high sales for second quarter

Nearly 30% increase in operating profit, profitability raised to 10.1%

Imaging was +11.6% sales and +19.0% operating profit for the quarter and +2.1% sales and -22.9% operating profit for the half.

For B-to-C products (Cameras and inkjet printers), stimulate demand by launching new products and strengthening marketing activities

The 2024 net sales forecast is +10.0% and net income +26.6%

The 2024 net sales forecast for Imaging is +13.0% over the previous forecast, and the operating profit forecast was adjusted +10.8%.

Buy your Canon cameras, lens, and accessories at B&H.

Let's compare the Canon EOS R5 Mark II to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II.

Check out the R5 II vs. R6 II specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R6 II? Here are the R5 II's advantages:

• 45-megapixel backside illuminated (BSI) imaging sensor vs. 24 non-BSI (the difference is big, but not everyone needs the higher resolution)
• 6.3 ms electronic shutter imaging sensor readout speed vs. 14.5 (the faster readout speed is most advantageous for fast movement)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator vs. DIGIC X
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Up to 1/32000 shutter speed vs. 1/16000 (extremely fast vs. really fast)
• Individual files are rapidly saved during pre-continuous shooting vs. a consolidated file written after the capture ends (the individual files create a significantly faster workflow in-camera and during post-processing)
• Upgraded AF system, including improved subject detection (especially for photographing subjects in motion)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• AF at EV -7.5 vs. -6.5 (darker is better, but EV -6.5 is extremely dark)
• 5.76 million Dot EVF vs. 3.69 for improved viewing experience
• Blackout-free EVF vs. no (tracking a moving subject while continuously shooting is considerably easier)
• 14-bit with electronic shutter vs. 12
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• 2.1 million dot LCD vs. 1.62 million
• In-body image stabilizer provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Up to 8k DCI 60p RAW, 4k DCI 60p SRAW, 4k DCI 120p MP4, 2k DCI 240p vs. 6K 60fps, 4K UHD 60 fps, FHD 180 fps
• Full-size HDMI Type-A port vs. micro type D
• Tally lamp vs. no (informs subject that movie is being recorded)
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E and 6 (6, 5, and 2.4 GHz) vs. 2.4 GHz
• CFexpress Type B plus SD vs. dual SD (CFexpress Type B is considerably faster but larger and more expensive)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• Includes a top LCD panel
• Speedlite shooting with electronic shutter supported
• Slightly raised Magnify, Info, and Q buttons
• New LP-E6P battery pack

That is a solid list.

Here are the R6 II's advantages:

• Up to ISO 102400 and 204800 vs. 51200 and 102400 (at the same ISO settings, the R6 II will have less noise when viewed at the pixel level. However, the R5 II image properly downsampled to 24 MP should appear similarly clean. The highest ISO settings are unusable)
• 40 fps vs. 30 (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast)
• 6K 60p ProRes RAW available (external recording only, with in-camera FHD proxy, 10-bit)
• Lower price

While few would choose the R6 II over the R5 II for features and capabilities, that last bullet, the lower price, makes this camera a great value and a top seller.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Sony a7S III firmware update version 3.02 is available for download (Sony).

Firmware Version 3.02 incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:

1. Fixed an issue where the ISO value was not reflected correctly when outputting RAW video to a RAW-compatible device connected via HDMI, and where the upper and lower limit ranges that could be set when the ISO value was set to AUTO were incorrect.
2. Fixed an issue where network connection was not possible.
3. Improved operational stability.

This update is only available for Windows and macOS. The memory card version is not available.

* Read the precautions before beginning this update.

Get the Sony a7S III at B&H.

Is upgrading to the Canon EOS R5 Mark II from the EOS R5 worth the upgrade cost?

Check out the R5 II vs. R5 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R5? Here are the R5 II's advantages:

• 45-megapixel backside illuminated (BSI) imaging sensor vs. non-BSI
• 30 fps full-bit depth (14) RAW frames per second vs. 20 fps 12-bit (30 is considerably faster than 20, which is also fast. Remember that focus bracketing uses the electronic shutter, which drops the bit depth to 12 on the R5)
• 6.3 ms electronic shutter imaging sensor readout speed vs. 16.3 (the R5 II is better suited for rendering fast action, such as a bird taking flight)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator vs. older DIGIC X (enables processing performance improvements)
• Up to 1/32000 shutter speed vs. 1/8000 (extremely fast compared to what was historically the fastest)
• Significantly upgraded AF system, including improved subject detection (vast improvement, especially for photographing subjects in motion)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• AF at EV -7.5 vs. -6 (darker is better, but EV -6 is already extremely dark)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Brighter and blackout-free EVF vs. no (tracking a moving subject while continuously shooting is considerably easier)
• In-body image stabilizer provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• Up to 8k DCI 60p RAW, 4k DCI 60p SRAW, 4k DCI 120p MP4, 2k DCI 240p vs. 8K 30p RAW, 4K DCI to 120 fps (the video capabilities are noticeably improved)
• Canon Log 2, Log 3 vs. Canon Log
• Simultaneous proxy recording at 8K 30p MP4 with Full HD MP4 proxy
• Pre-recording (3 or 5 seconds) (hindsight is far clearer than foresight)
• Waveform monitor, false color, and tally lamp vs. no
• Full-size HDMI Type-A port vs. micro type D
• Longer record times before overheating, with cooling vents and the CF-R20EP cooling fan grip is available
• Integrated workflow with Cinema EOS, RAW/MP4
• Anti-flicker along with High-Frequency Anti-Flicker that evaluates the scene and precisely adjusts the shutter speed to avoid banding and flicker, including from LED signage
• Speedlite shooting with electronic shutter supported
• Next-generation multi-function shoe capable of data communication and power delivery supporting new accessories
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (with JPG output only)
• SuperSpeed Plus USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB Type-C vs. 3.1 Gen 2
• 6, 5, and 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi vs. 5 and 2.4 GHz
• Power switch was moved to right side, a stills and video switch replaces the former power switch (the switch capability is a big upgrade, but the shape and position will drive R5 users crazy)
• Slightly raised Magnify, Info, and Q buttons (the raised buttons are easier to locate, especially in the dark)
• New LP-E6P battery pack
• Slightly lighter

What are the Canon EOS R5 advantages over the R5 II?

• Now discounted for a lower cost

The R5 II has the overwhelming advantage in all regards aside from price. Especially if your subjects moves, the R5 II is worth the upgrade cost.

However, the R5 is an outstanding camera, and the release of the R5 II does not change that. Especially with the R5 substantially discounted (while it lasts), those with less demanding needs may find that the R5, having the same resolution, is sufficient and that the R5 II is not worth the additional cost.

Landscape photographers must weigh the R5 II's advantages more carefully than wildlife and sports photographers. Videographers will prefer the R5 II.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5

It is surprising how similar the performance and feature set of the Canon EOS R5 Mark II are to those of the flagship EOS R1 announced at the same time.

Check out the R5 II vs. R1 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R1? Here is a summary of the R1's advantages:

• 40 fps for 230 frames vs. 30 fps for 93 (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast)
• 2.7 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 6.3 (faster is better, but 6.3 ms is sufficient for most needs)
• Up to ISO 102400 and 409600 vs. 51200 and 102400 (at the same ISO settings, the R1 will have less noise when viewed at the pixel level. However, the R5 II image properly downsampled to 24 MP should appear similarly clean. The highest ISO settings are unusable)
• Up to 1/64000 shutter speed vs. 1/32000 (crazy fast holds a small niche advantage over extremely fast)
• Cross-type AF points (holds the potential for higher AF precision)
• Smart Controllers (powerful controls after some acclimation)
• 9.44 million dots, 0.90x EVF vs. 5.76 and 0.76x (bigger and better)
• Dual CFexpress type B memory card slots vs. CFexpress type B and SD (though some may prefer having an SD slot available)
• Integrated vertical grip, LAN port, and GPS (outstanding grip ergonomics, the grip, port, and GPS are available accessories for the R5 II)
• Superior dust and weather resistance (with both bodies significantly sealed, will we notice the difference?)
• More controls and buttons (these make the camera faster and easier to use. And, more complicated?)
• More powerful 2750 mAh LP-E19 battery pack vs. 2130 mAh (but the R5 II holds 4260 mAh in the vertical grip)

The R5 II's advantages are:

• 45-megapixel imaging sensor vs. 24 (a big difference, but not everyone finds the higher resolution worth the increased storage size and processing time)
• 8k vs. 6K (higher resolution is better if you use 8k)
• Waveform monitor (why doesn't the R1 have this?)
• Has an SD card slot available (accommodates less expensive, but slower, memory cards)
• Holds 4260 mAh of power in the vertical grip vs. 2750 mAh
• Considerably smaller size and lighter weight (without a vertical grip)
• Has a cooling fan available
• Considerably less expensive (always a solid advantage)

While the most demanding professionals will want the R1, the R5 II's performance is sufficient for a high percentage of needs and some of its advantages are significant.

Let me know if I missed a meaningful difference.

If you have not already done so, order these cameras immediately if you have even a remote interest in them.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R1

The good news is that the Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM Lens dropped from the list. From Canon Japan (translated):

Apology and information regarding product supply status

Update date: July 23, 2024

Thank you for your continued patronage of Canon products.

Currently, we are experiencing delays in delivery for the following products due to orders exceeding our expectations and also due to the impact of global parts supply. We sincerely apologize to our customers and business partners for the inconvenience caused. We would like to apologize again for keeping our eagerly awaiting customers waiting for such a long time. We will continue to take measures to ensure a stable product supply so that we can deliver the products as soon as possible. We appreciate your understanding.

Product Name – About Supply

Canon EOS R1: We plan to ship the products one by one, but delivery may take longer than usual.

Canon EOS R5 Mark II: We plan to ship the products one by one, but delivery may take longer than usual.

Coling Fan: We plan to ship the products one by one, but delivery may take longer than usual.

Speedlight EL-1: We plan to ship the products one by one, but it is expected that it will take a considerable amount of time for delivery. If you place a new order, it may take up to six months for delivery.